10/10/14 Digital Government , Research

Regional Governments and ICT policy coordination

Many regional governments in Italy have tried to solve the problem of coordinating different levels of government and different local ICT policies through the creation of ad-hoc public companies. These companies are owned by the regional government itself or by a consortium of local actors, and have the goal to ensure more flexibility and specific capacity in providing advanced services to provinces and municipalities. This raises questions about their actual efficiency and effectiveness.

A paper with Chiara Assunta Ricci provides a brief overview of recent e-government policies of the Italian regions with a focus on the coordination models between local actors. In particular, the role of regional information technology (IT) public companies is explored through a cluster analysis based on evidence from an ad hoc survey. Advantages and disadvantages of the different coordination models are discussed. In particular, two composite indices are employed: (i) an index of the intensity of coordination at the regional level; (ii) an index of effectiveness of IT policies, measured as the level of advancement of municipalities in the use of ICTs. The two indices are then compared with the coordination models adopted. Preliminary results show a positive correlation between the two indices, while the presence of an IT public company does not appear to significantly affect either the IT performance nor the level of coordination.

Here is an earlier (full) version of the paper (in Italian), presented at the XXXIII Annual Scientific Conference of the Italian Regional Science Association (AISRe), Rome, Italy.
Here is the final version published in Economia e Politica Industriale – Journal of Industrial and Business Economics.


IT companies owned by regional government in Italy (x = dimension; y= no. of activities / topic covered)

Untitled 2

Italian Regions (x = ICT policy coordination index; y = effectiveness of ICT policy index; “No IH” = Regions not owing any IT company; clusters = see previous graph)

fig 3 colori



0 likes no responses
My Twitter Feed
RT @aberemliysky: Dite la vostra per costruire la politica di coesione del futuro! Consultazione pubblica sui #FondiUE nel settore della co…
RT @DatiGovIT: La governance degli Open Data in Italia, lo spunto di riflessione di @dagoneye e @alberto_cottica #…
[paper] Partisanship, Propaganda, and Disinformation: Online Media and the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election
Analisi socio-economica del territorio e politiche di #coesione - con appendice statistica…
RT @okfnedu: #OpenData as Open Educational Resources: Case studies of emerging practice by @jatenas & @leohavemann with @juancommander @agb
RT @lucadebiase: Un brutto giorno per la neutralità della rete
RT @demartin: Il mio editoriale di ieri su #netneutrality: "Internet una questione di libertà" @Antonellogiac @Die
[paper, PDF] Politics of Disclosure: Organizational #Transparency as Multiactor Negotiation…
Version 13.5 of the e-Gov Reference Library has been published #EGRL #egov #research #phdchat #OpenGov
Can we learn from Yelp in improving public services? Tell us what you think #civictech #CivicMonitoring
Recent Comments
- Putting research into practice: Training academics to use Open Data as OER: An experience from Uruguay | Thoughts on Open Education to OpenCoesione School – A scalable learning format using OpenData as Educational Resources
[…] developed by A Scuola di Open Coesione, and in the work t Chiara Ciociola and Luigi Reggi...
- Così fallisce l’Open Government: quando lo Stato fa auto-gol | to A (long) list of the risks of Open Government
[…] un post di un paio di settimane fa mi sono cimentato in una prima lista dei possibili ris...
- Così fallisce l'Open Government: quando lo Stato fa auto-gol | Tech Economy to A (long) list of the risks of Open Government
[…] analisi dell’esistente, l’Open Government porta con sé grandi potenzialità m...

A citizen monitoring marathon of the development projects financed by the European Union